Gain Access to Git Hub Repository :
VerbaTerra is an interdisciplinary research initiative that explores how culture shapes language through rituals, trade, symbolism, and social structures. The project unites computational modelling, anthropology, and linguistics to simulate cultural–linguistic evolution and offer data-driven insights into how languages adapt, change, and survive.
At its core, VerbaTerra builds open-source tools—such as the ICLHF and CALR frameworks, simulation engines like vSION and NΦRA, and a growing cultural–linguistic dataset—to advance cultural resilience through linguistic understanding. From academic inquiry to applied policy, VerbaTerra serves educators, researchers, and communities who seek to preserve and empower linguistic diversity in a rapidly globalising world.
Harshit Gupta is a cultural computation researcher, systems thinker, and the architect of the VerbaTerra project. His work bridges computational simulation, historical linguistics, and cultural theory. His thesis, Language as a Cultural Algorithm, laid the foundation for VerbaTerra’s core models and its unique approach to mapping how societies shape language structure across time.
Harshit’s research reflects a deep commitment to protecting the world’s linguistic and cultural diversity—not through static preservation, but by understanding how adaptation itself becomes a form of resilience. He believes that honoring cultural complexity is not only a scientific pursuit but a political and ethical one.
We didn’t start with a product. We started with an itch: culture shapes cognition, cognition shapes language… so why do most systems treat language like it’s floating in a vacuum? One long night and too much coffee later, the idea became a stance: model culture first, let language fall out of it.
We gave that stance a spine—ICLHF, our Integrated Cultural–Linguistic Heuristic Framework. Four stubborn forces kept appearing in the data and in history books: ritual, trade, symbolism, hierarchy. Not poetry. Parameters. Then CALR—Cultural Adaptation & Linguistic Resilience—closed the loop, forcing every simulation to adapt or break. If it couldn’t survive stress, it didn’t belong in our model.
Engines followed. First came vSION, the simulator. It’s the world-builder that spins up societies, pokes them with shocks, and watches their grammars stretch or snap. Then Analyst, the interpreter, stepped in: NLIS to score neuro-linguistic integration, CRM to measure cultural resilience, plus clustering, correlations, and those uncomfortable directionality checks that kill easy answers. Finally Nexus, the application layer, took the outputs and made them usable: dashboards, run-experiment flows, reviewer tools—the “put it in people’s hands” layer.
We set rules early: evidence over vibes, demos over declarations, and every technical paper reads like a design log—architecture first, annexes for the math, no theatrics in the middle. We migrated the work from notebook land to grown-up infra: Vertex/Kaggle when compute is needed, static hosting where it isn’t, GitHub for the full public spine. Lean by design, not just by budget.
Then we turned outward. We opened the doors to the community with a Submission Center—five lanes: Simulations, Framework, Hypothesis, Debugging, Experimental. Uploads feed a reviewer queue; decisions get receipts; good work gets daylight. The architecture graphic went live because transparency beats mystique, and the “Under Development” modal ships with a countdown synced to real time—because shipping is a habit.
Today, VerbaTerra is not a paper, not a demo, not a repo. It’s a stack that treats culture→cognition→language as a system, not a slogan:
vSION generates realities.
Analyst tests them to breaking.
Nexus makes the results useful.
ICLHF/CALR keeps us honest.
NLIS/CRM keep score.
What’s next? Reviewer portals with transparent changelogs. Analyst as an authenticated endpoint. Nexus as a proper “Run Experiment → compare → export” studio. And regular open data drops, because if it can’t be replicated, it doesn’t count.
We’re traditional about one thing: build carefully, cite properly, and earn trust. Everything else—interfaces, models, even our favorite assumptions—stays provisional. If the data says pivot, we pivot. If the community finds a better way, we ship it. That’s the whole story so far—and the plan to keep it alive.